27 April

Where are the instructions for the one-world economic reset coming from? Part Five

South Africa's biggest threat is from business intelligence networks working with the World Economic Forum (WEF) as influencers and agents of influence within South Africa, mitigating ex-apartheid collaborators. Authorities should scrutinise these shareholders as influencers who undermine the Constitution and use lawlessness as a tool for economic sabotage to achieve the objectives reflected in Operation Vulindlela.

The WEF is a global congregation of CEOs and business leaders. BlackRock and Vanguard are the majority shareholders in many of these companies, and the WEF's introduction of the one-world economic reset would not have been possible without their patronage. Understanding the nature of relationships between BlackRock and Vanguard as shareholders within the companies attending Davos is critical.

China is Klaus Schwab's champion, and its social credit system (SCS) is recognised as one of the country's most remarkable achievements. The Chinese Communist Party is leveraging the South African Communist Party (SACP) to influence liberation movements to introduce the SCS, see the screenshot below.

Africanism seems revived with guidance from the Chinese Communist Party (backed by the WEF to counter BRICS) to steer influencers within the ANC to achieve SCS. The COVID-19 lockdown was used as a trigger by Fikile Mbalula, the then Minister of Transport, to pilfer the rail infrastructure with the assistance of organised crime networks, which constituted terrorism/sabotage (see the screenshots below). FM was subsequently protected and deployed (who is receiving the surveillance contracts “to fight crime”) as the ANC's Secretary General (SG). China seems to be the preferred frontrunner in introducing a new rail network. However, the GNU wants to bring companies from the EU to reintroduce a new rail network.

This pattern was repeated with Eskom's "collapse", which enabled the introduction of Independent Power Producers (IPP); it involved highly organised crime networks committing sabotage seemingly associated with the terrorist networks linked to liberation movements in Africa. The SG shielded ex-apartheid collaborators within the ANC. The state intelligence securitisation apparatus protects the culprits, with the blessing of the private sector.

The DA is fast-tracking the implementation of the digital ID along with ex-apartheid collaborators in the ANC, as it will enable a cashless system that could be linked to UBI.

For SCS to be successfully implemented in South Africa, it must roll out high-speed fibre (Vumatel/Remgro) and 5G (Rain), which is necessary for a surveillance state (Vumacam/Bidvest). Digitalisation (GNU) of IDs is required for a social credit score (ANC) to introduce a cashless system (banks reducing ATMs), and to introduce a universal basic income (UBI) grant (SACP). These goals were included in the Operation Vulindlela objectives created post the fake COVID-19 plandemic.

The Protection of Personal Information (POPI) Act is another oxymoron used by the private sector to allow the implementation of draconian surveillance agendas, for example, at "security estates," with security companies having access to government databases (AARTO Act and Home Affairs). Crime is used as the catalyst, but the system targets law-abiding citizens. The owners of these new systems are listed companies that own and privatise government databases.

The unholy trinity in South Africa is defined as:

• rogue philanthropists (also referred to as White Minority Capital) advancing the undemocratic agendas of the one-world economic order,
• rogue ex-state intelligence securitisation apparati (SISA) working with career criminals framing agendas to legitimise their illegal activities (to justify the war on terror) and
• ex-apartheid spies (mostly false-flag) deployed as political/economic elites acting as agents of influence for the private sector inside liberation movements (ANC).

Treason definition: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/treason

Economic sabotage: Economic sabotage 'taking the country back' – SOC chief executives | SAnews

Understanding a criminal enterprise: What is a criminal enterprise? - Military Modelling

AI describes stakeholder capitalism as:

“Stakeholder capitalism is an untested economic system or philosophy in which businesses prioritise the interests of all their stakeholders—not just shareholders (owners or investors)—when making decisions. In addition to shareholders, stakeholders include employees, customers, suppliers, local communities, the environment, and society. The idea is that companies should create long-term value for all these groups rather than focusing solely on maximising short-term profits for shareholders, which is often associated with traditional shareholder capitalism.

Stakeholder capitalism encourages businesses to consider broader social and environmental impacts. For example, a company might invest in sustainable practices, improve employee working conditions, or support community projects, even if these choices don’t immediately boost stock prices. The concept gained traction as a response to criticisms of unchecked capitalism, like inequality, environmental degradation, and corporate scandals.

It’s often linked to figures like Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum, who popularised it through initiatives like the "Davos Manifesto" in 1973 and later updates. Critics argue it’s vague, prone to corporate PR spin (like greenwashing), or even a step toward centralised control if governments or elites push it too hard. Supporters say it’s a necessary evolution to make capitalism more inclusive and sustainable.”

Effects of elitism:

1. Unemployment
2. SME closure
3. Inequality
4. Presidency breaking the law.
5. SME collapse
6. High unemployment
7. Eskom sabotaged and privatised.
8. Denel is in the process of being privatised
9. ISCOR privatised and closed down
10. Prasa is in the process of being privatised
11. SAA is in the process of being privatised
12. Telkom in process to be privatised
13. SABC collapsed
14. Transnet is dead.
15. Petro SA is dead.
16. The Post Office collapsed.
17. The land bank is ineffective.
18. Johannesburg has collapsed.
19. Bloemfontein had collapsed 
20. Durban has collapsed.
21. Intelligence collapsed
22. SANDF imploding.
23. Judiciary imploding.
24. NPA cronyism.
25. The Hawks haven’t prosecuted any Mafia structures
26. SAPS lost detective capacity, and private security is taking over-who is more corrupt?

Introducing the SCS model from China- solution introduced by elites in alignment with the WEF

1. High-speed fibre
2. 5G
3. Going Cashless
4. Social credit score
5. Digital ID
6. Surveillance-Camera rollout
7. Universal basic income (UBI)
8. Open borders

25 April

Where are the instructions for the one-world economic reset coming from? Part Four

In light of the Minister of Finance's inability to get his budget approved in 2025, it is critical to understand the historical variables that have led South Africa to this calamity. Since the inception of the agenda more than 40 years ago, strategists employed by the private sector (third force) have plotted the collapse of the ANC government.

Business leaders have been working with the elites (political and economic) they established within liberation movements since their unbanning in 1990. This relationship negatively reflects the CEO's ability to address inequality, as South Africa is last on the Gini Coefficient after 35 years of corporate social investment (CSI) strategies. Additionally, big businesses' one-world economic reset agenda seems to have increased unemployment, corruption, lawlessness, and crime. The World Economic Forum (WEF) has scaled down CSI strategies, replacing them with ESG compliance. BlackRock and Vanguard have also scaled down on ESG compliance.

Did organised businesses in South Africa decide by themselves that they need a new one-world economic order reset using the fake COVID-19 agenda, which coincidentally corresponds with the WEF objectives? These objectives are nefarious activities (the unilateral change of the economic order in South Africa resulted in thousands of SMEs closing down) by businesses that are the foundation for many other agendas, such as implementing the WEF “great reset” agenda. For example, the social credit system (SCS) agenda deployed in China is supported by Klaus Schwab as a WEF agenda and is now emerging in South Africa. SCS depends on mass surveillance. Crime is used as a facilitator to allow security companies to install cameras. Cameras do not reduce crime. Private businesses are making money from taxpayers through crime. Where are the checks and balances of this new economic system?

The ANC must have realised it is not controlling its destination; outsiders steer strategic decision-making positions, as with the 25 unidentified persons deployed by business to conceptualise Operation Vulindlela. These faceless people conceptualised Operation Vulindlela and are reshaping the new economic model big corporations envisioned for themselves; the public was not invited to participate. Questions must be raised about the interrelationships among 160 business CEOs and their seemingly overt “contribution” to government, as reflected by the B4SA website. What is the relationship between Operation Vulindlela and B4SA?

Businesses owe their allegiance to the Constitution (government) of South Africa. When this allegiance is deliberately manipulated to undermine the sovereignty of the Constitution and intentionally advance agendas against the people of South Africa, such as collapsing infrastructure and working with foreign “terrorists” to create an environment of lawlessness. These are elements of treason that require the state to act. However, the problem is that state intelligence securitisation apparati (SISA) are deployed at the behest of the unholy trinity. It is a constitutional crisis. Are big businesses the judge, jury, and executioner of the new one-world economic order?

In addition, the private sector openly abuses its relationship with ex-apartheid collaborators deployed after the unbanning of the ANC and other liberation movements. The acid test will always be whether the ANC can mitigate past mistakes by preventing collaborators from entering strategic decision-making positions.

There is one solution: tell the truth, trust your supporters, and share everything with them.

See the screenshots below to understand the depth of the problem. South Africa cannot afford this cesspool of lawlessness and dysfunctionality by organised business.

23 April

Where are the instructions for the one-world economic reset coming from? Part Three

COVID-19 was a coordinated global event supposedly designed to trigger a total economic reset. It provided a rare glimpse into the mechanisms that attempt to create a new one-world economic order. Researchers following the instructions for the global one-world economic reset agenda uncovered the nexus with the “great reset," a term coined by Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum (WEF).

The WEF was established with the assistance of the Bilderberg group, which was created after World War II to manage the economic exclusivity between Europe and North America and prevent a WWIII. Henry Kissinger, representing the Bilderberg group, coached and sanctioned Klaus Schwab to steer the WEF. See the screenshot below.

The relationship between the WEF and apartheid business elites in South Africa is reflected in the use of the term Corporate Social Investment (CSI). CSI was sold to liberation movements (ANC) as an agent for change to address inequality. In South Africa, the private sector, referred to by former and late President FW De Klerk as the “real third force” (see the screenshot below), exploited the CSI (derived from corporate social responsibility in the US) and Sullivan Principles (from the US) to create the illusion of wealth redistribution.

Klaus Schwab was not told about the motive for CSI, and his business intelligence strategist from South Africa, helping the WEF, was unaware that CSI was, in essence, a fake strategy coined by apartheid elites to fund the deployments of mostly ex-state securitisation collaborators (suspected) within the liberation movements (ANC). Elites are still trying to present CSI as a corporate responsibility solution and are oblivious to the continued backroom securitisation interventions.

CSI failures in South Africa result from CEOs not understanding the historical variables and incompetent securitisation mitigators. However, CSI provides investigators with enough evidence illustrating the cooperation between apartheid elites from South Africa and the WEF elites.

Businesses in South Africa are organised around Business Unity South Africa (BUSA). The CEO of BUSA, Cas Coovadia, created Business for South Africa (B4SA) and Business Leadership South Africa (BLSA) during COVID-19 to help businesses exert additional pressure to enforce their mandatory lockdown agenda. Did Rupert and Rothschild gave their blessing in these formations to Cas Coovadia?

The first CEO of B4SA was Martin Kingston, also the CEO of Rothschild & Co SA during COVID-19. Their objectives, released in September 2024, “Bringing business and government together”, undersigned by 160 CEOS, provide credence to Operation Vulindlela's agenda of CR and other deployments (it's in effect insider trading). The CEO of BLSA, Busi Mavuso, is a former employee of Rothschild & Co in Johannesburg, where she worked under Martin Kingston. Mavuso contributed to the investigations into the allegations of sabotage at Eskom. DD Mabuza, the deputy president, resigned shortly after the report was handed over to SAPS. The kingpins were never arrested.

Understanding the intricacies of these networks, established following the unbanning of liberation movements, will provide researchers with insights into how business elites in South Africa pursue their profit objectives alongside the WEF's “great reset” strategies without contributing to alleviating inequality.

Should the assets of conglomerates be forfeited to the state if they are involved in treason? Can a country's (South Africa's) economy survive the collapse of conglomerates? Is it possible to argue that for countries' economies to survive, they must restructure or dismantle conglomerates? The vacuum will be filled.

20 April

Where are the instructions for the one-world economic reset coming from? Part Two

The trinity (private business, state securitisation and apartheid spies within the liberation movements, including the SACP), also known as the enlightened action group (EAG), empowered the ANC as a buffer against the economically marginalised (civil discontent). The trinity as a collective utilised state intelligence securitisation apparatus (SISA) and secret societies (Freemasons and Broederbond/Brotherhood) to influence strategies. Operation Vulindlela is one such strategy.

The Freemasons were used to accommodate retired SISA operatives, because Masonry structures were conducive to keeping secrets. In return, these Mason operatives were looked after by big businesses, giving them security contracts or employment. The only requirement was that they comply with Freemason secrecy. What is the relationship between the CEOs supporting B4SA during COVID-19 and the company’s providing their security?

The Broederbond companies (Sanlam and Naspers) created black elites and deployed them in their boardrooms. The Broederbond also changed its name to Afrikanerbond. The Afrikanerbond does not openly drive agendas but is a highly influential organisation that supposedly protects Afrikaner interests. The Afrikanerbond loyalty was revealed during COVID-19, with Naspers supporting the Davos one-world economic reset agenda.

The secret societies seem to support the one-world economic reset agenda and are aware of the “greater good” strategy. The secret societies in South Africa greatly influence liberation movements indirectly, particularly progressive forces. The ANC, SACP, EFF, and MK leaders act as agents provocateurs, making absurd statements that are carefully crafted framing agendas on behalf of those who wish to enhance the GNU narrative for the private sector, introducing a surveillance state, gun-free societies, cashless systems, digital IDs, and more.

For example, does the SACP Secretary General know what the objective of the Universal Basic Income (UBI) grant is? Does Solly Mapaila realise that UBI is a one-world economic reset objective? It has nothing to do with poverty alleviation or redressing inequality and is a step toward total control over society. UBI was not crafted in South Africa, forming part of a broader conspiracy. He proposed that the government replace the Relief of Distress payments introduced after the fake COVID-19 pandemic with UBI to “broaden the discourse”. COVID-19 was used to teach and coach the poor using the SASSA grant system, preparing them for UBI. Who within SISA is protecting South Africans against these acts of treason? It should be a capital offence- the supporters of Davos are killing/murdering people by the thousands.

Does the SACP know that UBI is directly linked to the Chinese Social Credit System (SCS)? China is the champion of Klaus Schwab, collaborating to implement a one-world order. Does the SACP realise that SCS is directly linked to the surveillance state agenda? Does it understand that the ANC signed a R5 billion deal with Vumacam to fight a crime (a deliberate lie) that belonged to Maziv (the Rupert family)? Is the SACP/ANC facilitating “great reset” activities for Davos and empowering a select few? We will examine business and China's role in this process soon.

The same questions should be directed to the DA and GNU regarding their support for a digital ID. Do they endorse the cashless system that requires the digital ID and implement UBI alongside the private sector surveillance system (paid by the taxpayers)? When did the DA supporters vote for this shift in policy?

Does the SACP/EFF/ANC/MK submit to illegal mass surveillance that will dictate your social credit score? Does the EFF know that it’s one Africa and open border agenda with Parliament in Midrand is also part of the one-world economic reset agenda to create continental economic blocks?

Secret societies have created conformists to the one-world economic reset agenda. Participants have lost their moral compass by yielding to the objectives of the anti-Christ nestled in the EU/WEF alliance. It's all about making the rich richer; there is not one strategy to alleviate inequality.

18 April

Where are the instructions for the one-world economic reset coming from? Part One

What is the global pecking order, and who reports to whom? There is no societal equality, and most countries carry baggage or secrets. This highly contentious and complex environment requires in-depth analysis and understanding of securitisation and business intelligence functions. Part One aims to provide a concise history, focusing on critical variables that must be considered when developing solutions for inequality.

When the South African apartheid societal apparatus researched the civil uprising in the US during the 1960s, it determined that corporations identified inequality in the workplace as a threat, which the US countered with corporate social responsibility (CSR). Apartheid strategists decided in 1969 to approach the Bilderberg group for assistance in mitigating liberation movements that exploit inequality.

Also in 1969, South African liberation movements gathered for the Morogoro Conference in Tanzania to reorganise their focus. The South African Communist Party (SACP) reportedly leveraged the African National Congress (ANC) to expand its support base. In turn, the ANC required the SACP's financial backing. The ANC was on a short leash to the SACP and sought alternative income sources.

All liberation movements in Africa at the time resorted to crime as a supplementary source of income, which extended to their armed factions, referred to as terrorist groups. These terrorist groups also engaged in specific criminal activities for additional funding. Consequently, liberation movements and terrorist groups became a haven for criminals. The ANC shared a reciprocal relationship with these highly organised criminal networks within the liberation movements in Africa.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) was established in 1971 by Klaus Schwab with coaching from the Bilderberg Group’s Henry Kissinger. The WEF would never be allowed to become a power base without the support of the Bilderberg Group, which was created to protect the interests of Western Europe and the US economies and to prevent a Third World War. The WEF was intended to address inequality in the EU and become an agent of economic reset. The WEF is creating chaos, disorder and lawlessness with the aim of “out of chaos comes order”. This exercise is extremely expensive and unsustainable.

Klaus Schwab had a close relationship with apartheid South Africa at a time when sanctions severely hampered its economic activities. With all the CEOs gathering at Davos yearly from all the big businesses, it became a recruitment mecca for state intelligence apparati.

In 1976, after the SOWETO civil uprising, the apartheid state intelligence apparati identified the influx of career criminals into the camps of liberation movements in exile as an opportunity to mitigate liberation movements. These criminals were fleeing the townships where they ran criminal operations as alternative (Robin Hood) economies to the apartheid formal economy. Stolen appliances and clothes from the formal economy found its way to the informal economy.

These criminal agents of influence, co-opted by liberation movements, became targets for the state intelligence securitisation apparatus (SISA). Career criminals were transformed into highly trained intelligence assets to infiltrate African liberation movements.

After 1994, business elites employed and defended apartheid collaborators (career criminals). The South African crime issue is directly related to and exploited as an opportunity by businesses to promote the one-world economic reset agenda. The implementation of cashless systems (which banks own?), surveillance initiatives (billions paid to Vumacam/Rupert with taxpayers' money to combat crime), and digital IDs (with the DA leading the agenda using GNU to front for business) stemmed from criminal activities connected to liberation movements (ANC).

The world knows (Trump) what is happening, and the extreme rush by South African foot soldiers to hide the truth is too late. The Gini is out. South African strategists were caught with their pants around their ankles! They need new strategies to address unemployment, inequality, corruption and lawlessness, but it seems that the same old networks are regurgitating their failed strategies. It is not a solution, and the government/business can save itself a lot of money by staying away from these cowboys!

16 April

Inequality is the foundation for profiteering agendas

Inequality in politics, economics, and religion is one of the most significant societal obstacles to economic emancipation. Additionally, inequality serves as a catalyst, providing business strategists with opportunities to develop profit-driven agendas.

After liberation movements were unbanned in 1990, the private sector was entrusted with the responsibility of managing former apartheid intelligence assets. Corporate social investment funds (CSI) were seemingly misappropriated by businesses to develop BBBEE elites. The elites acted as agents of influence to ensure the private sector's economic models would not be compromised.

However, apartheid strategists knew that greed would overwhelm the ANC based on patterns from other African liberation movements that had achieved independence. The private sector and its deployed assets' laissez-faire approach could allow a culture of kleptocracy (from career criminals) to develop in the ANC, which will enable them to self-destruct. In addition, the destructive impact of wrecking balls used alongside former agents of influence, the ANC is imploding. Media framing agendas create smoke and mirrors to expose criminality within the ANC while concealing wrongdoing in business, as they cannot publish unfavourable information about their employers.

The US neoliberal economic model, implemented after the unbanning of liberation movements in 1990, aimed to alleviate inequality. Academia and researchers in South Africa have cautioned the private sector about the limitations of the neoliberal agenda pursued by corporations. Neoliberalism, stakeholder capitalism, and the Great Economic Reset are designed and implemented to fail.

The current economic model introduced by the Government of National Unity (GNU) in South Africa revolves around the World Economic Forum (WEF) CSI/ESG compliance objective to address climate change (digitalisation of data despite uncontrollable cybercrime levels) and the United Nations' 17 sustainable development goals.

Businesses are portrayed as the heroes who forced GNU and privatised state-owned enterprises that the ANC destroyed. The cowboys (CEOs of BUSA, B4SA, and BLSA) arrived just in time to save the day—the modern version of a good cowboy movie.

The introduction of GNU was based on promises of ensuring investments (CR coming back from the EU claiming billions, even trillions of Rands). GNU is a precondition to all the trillions. But it is not investments; it is loans. CR is dishonest, misleading, and self-centred failure. Business keeps him there because they make money.

Businesses' inequality programs, supposedly using CSI funds, failed. Businesses are making serious money in South Africa; they control the CSI money, not the ANC or government. Businesses failed to address inequality using CSI funds.

The leadership and intellectual capacity within the state intelligence securitisation apparatus will have to address inequality by mitigating big businesses' profiteering strategies and agendas.

13 April

Inequality is the biggest threat to the Constitution. Part Six

Corporate Social Investment (CSI), a term coined by apartheid businesses in South Africa during the 1980s, is rooted in Corporate Social Responsibility, which originated in the US, with one main objective: addressing inequality. While CSI’s impact is prominently highlighted in annual reports, the Gini Coefficient, unemployment rates, corruption, and lawlessness reveal a failed corporate strategy in combating inequality. Some private sector companies utilise CSI for tax breaks or BBBEE points instead of actively working to dismantle inequality.

Additionally, corporations have failed to address newly established elites (primarily ex-apartheid collaborators deployed after 1990) who act as agents of influence within the ANC (government and business). Consequently, CEOs have lost credibility by trying to sugarcoat their CSI strategies meant to address inequality in disadvantaged communities. As a result, marginalised groups may feel excluded from political (GNU is a business strategy) and economic opportunities. All these business failures have consequences.

The masses will experience frustration, anger, and a sense of injustice, which can fuel radicalisation and violent extremism. Inequality and selective application of the law contribute to lawlessness and the reactivation of organised crime activities used by liberation movements as additional funding mechanisms, responding to business economic exclusivity agendas, with full awareness of state intelligence securitisation apparati deployed and approved by ex-apartheid intelligence operatives. Corruption and terrorism are expected to manifest from these marginalisation processes introduced by the private sector.

In addition, the WEF realised that the CSI used by South African businesses is more of a PR stunt than a solution and has decided to incorporate ESG compliance globally after the COVID-19 fiasco in 2020. The “S” still allows corporations to showcase charity, local development projects, and employee volunteering. The World Economic Forum's (WEF) stakeholder capitalism, the Great Reset, and technological infrastructure upgrades are collapsing economies because they are unsustainable and only benefit the profiteering agendas of elites.

Inequality exacerbates societal dysfunctionality and together with utilitarianism polarises the haves with have-nots. This can create fertile ground for progressive forces' recruitment of career criminals to assist with funding freedom fighters (terrorist groups) that offer an ideological narrative that promises to address these grievances.

The violence against businesses (cash in transit, illegal mining, sabotage of infrastructure) is all reminiscent of these failures. Businesses are aware of the imminent civil uprising and surround themselves with ex-special forces operatives to protect them under the banner of security.

Making matters worse, social responsibility aimed at addressing corporate exploitation is a complete failure. The selective application of the law and misleading perceptions linked to the Great Reset agenda exacerbate lawlessness. CSI is not part of businesses' core functions, and companies aspire to take over non-profit state-owned enterprises to provide a service—another oxymoron by corporations.

Below is a GROK 3 summary reaffirming fears.

A 2016 study by Krieger and Meierrieks in Oxford Economic Papers found that economic inequality increases domestic terrorism, particularly in democracies where grievances are visible but unaddressed. The 2015 Paris attackers, for instance, came from marginalised suburbs with high unemployment and poverty rates (e.g., Seine-Saint-Denis, where youth unemployment hit 40 %+).