25 December
Why has the private sector failed to find corporate social investment solutions?
Leaders of liberation movements chase money in the same way as businesses. Philanthropists and liberation movements are essentially business partners. GG Alcock, an expert on KasiNomics, accredited Stephen Walters, who identified where the wealth is distributed in South Africa. Intelligence analysts directed Stephen informally to the former TBVC countries. There is more wealth in these former TBVC settlements (according to the confirmed research by Stephen) than in the Western Cape Southern Coastal area. Much of the wealth (not identified by Walters) seems to originate from illicit economic activities (mostly cash-based). Significantly, crime activities associated with additional funding for terrorism and liberation movements are almost non-existent in these areas. There are specific reasons for this, known to businesses and liberation movements.
Tracing back the (business) roll-out of the agenda (after the revelations by GG Alcock) to convert the informal economy (spaza shops) into digital hubs to create cashless societies revealed how the one-world order goals within informal settlements (a R750 billion untaxed economy) will be achieved. The private sector exposed its modus operandi. It showed who and how its champions within the political environment are.
The destruction of thousands of spazas within the informal economy, closing them down just before Christmas, after the deliberate poisoning of food of a few spaza shops (see the screenshots below), allowing specific elements in the government to introduce “new” legislation and closing down 1000s of small businesses (see the screenshots below) that were mostly cash-based. The media framing (see the screenshots below) and the non-compliance become more important than the causes of these corporate terrorist activities. The digitalisation of the informal economy is proof (see the screenshots below) of the private sector trying to access the informal economy. Only a select few businesses participate in the one-world economic order digitalisation processes. It is not an ANC strategy to work with rogue philanthropists. Who in the ANC works with the private sector?
The response by elements in government backed by the private sector in closing down spaza shops (the informal economy) based on a couple of murders, using SAPS (see the screenshot below) to enforce the new laws, must be a new low in economic accountability. The president was used to create the “terror”. It is economic terrorism!
Businesses increasingly say one thing and do another. They claim to be fighting inequality and introducing corporate social investment (CSI) strategies, but they are profiteering agendas. Excessive profiteering is masked using apartheid CSI strategies and rolling out an artificially created one-world-order sustainability economic agenda endorsed by the World Economic Forum (WEF) 2030 agenda and the UN 17 SDGs.
The unholy trinity in South Africa is defined as:
22 December
The future cannot be constructed on lies; selling off state-owned enterprises will not increase government effectiveness.
It is a lie that the ANC government is responsible for the collapse of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The private sector had already engineered the collapse of SOEs before the unbanning of liberation movements in 1990. The killing of Chris Hani confirmed the agenda. Businesses deployed agents of influence in the ANC, and together, they “inserted” deployments within SOEs. The ANC was never in charge of anything! This was evident when businesses protected CR in the Phalagate case and those who protected him.
The media narrative focusing on SOE collapse needs scrutiny from the state intelligence securitisation apparati (SISA) as it is the platform for privatisation. See the screenshots below. Mining, Energy, Communication, and SOEs (Transnet, Telkom, Post Office, and Eskom) are destroyed to benefit the private sector. Who buys these companies? Would the private sector purchase non-profitable entities?
Many SISA deployments are hidden within the president's office, creating alternative illegal operations. GNU needs to scrutinise these rogue SISA operatives allegedly deployed by the presidency (why do the political parties allow these suspected rogue operations, except if they benefit from them).
The impact of these deployments is reflected in the behaviour of the minister of sport, who instituted a forensic investigation into the affairs of SAFA. The minister failed to consider the following very important factors. Firstly, SAFA reports to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA), giving full account of their financial affairs. Who asked the minister to institute a Forensic enquiry, and who will conduct the “scrutiny”? Secondly, the minister of finance and the president reported the money shortage and the economy's collapse; see the screenshots below (it is only logical that SAFA and SARU will also suffer from induced CSI limitations or FINANCIAL SUFFOCATION). Thirdly, maybe it is necessary to look at the minister's relationship with Gavin Varejes (his mentor and KK). Richmark Holdings
has long been targeting the control of SAFA–See the SLAM notice and the Richmark website from many years ago.
Gavin Varejes created Rugby Legends as his pet project to gain influence inside SARU—see the photo below. Ian Small Smith represents ex-apartheid rogue career criminals. The foreign SISA structure uses the Jewish mafia structures in South Africa as leverage within Afrikaner groups. They lost that influence and are now trying to use the latest protégé, the honourable minister.
Varejes also created Richmark Holdings in honour of the Jewish Mafia kingpin Marc Rich. It is well known that the Jewish Mafia want to take advantage of the financials within SAFA in the same manner they did with SARU and rugby legends. Illicit drug use and increase in the use of performance-enhancement drugs in school sports. Who is benefiting from Mafia circles? The minister seems to be sleeping on the job.
Maybe if SISA did do their job, they could have advised the honorary minister that sport is under attack by the Jewish Mafia in South Africa screenshots below. They want to use sport as the foundation for their attacks on the ANC government for not complying with the vision of Israel.
The collaborators in the ANC and big businesses (see the CEOs involved with compulsory Vaccinations for COVID-19) trying to implement the one-world economic order (undermining the constitution) constitute sedition and or treason.
20 December
Is the unholy trinity steering the collaborators within progressive forces?
Who is causing conflict between the political parties within the Radical Economic Transformation (RET) constituency, also called the Progressive Forces? Who is fuelling the fight between the EFF and MKP, for example? SISA assets within these political structures are suspected of destabilising the RET constituency.
It is the unholy trinity that is allowing its own historic crime networks within the ANC/liberation movement to create the perception of lawlessness (sabotage, kidnapping, extortion, drug smuggling, assassinations).
Unconfirmed reports indicate that rogue apartheid SISA structures from the unholy trinity have been reactivated to drive specific crime strategies (unconfirmed allegations suggest that rogue SISA operatives from the president's office mitigate this), assist in constructing the lawlessness agenda, and introduce the one-world economic order. The increase in specific crime activities utilised by rogue SISA is blamed on the RET forces. The pretenders of RET (in the ANC) justify the installation of cameras, promote one Africa (open borders), a cashless society, and allow big businesses into the informal economy.
The media (which belongs to the private sector) is framing RET as the source for corruption, cadre deployment, load-shedding, and “mafia” crimes (water, extortion, construction, etc.). Framing is typically used when securitisation structures want to insert an agenda to justify (cameras) their actions (it is academically well-researched). Press freedom does not give journalists the right to enforce opinions. Nobody is doing oversight.
The NPA (with apartheid third force ties) selectively apply the law and actively protects career criminals (SISSA assets). Their criminal activities are allowed under the auspices of “the war on terror”. The Mbombela assassinations and sabotaging of Eskom come to mind. Who is protecting these career criminals? They are destroying South Africa. As Jonathan Oppenheimer said, it is “creative destruction.”
18 December
How can we identify which progressive forces introduce the agenda of the unholy trinity?
South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) introduced Social Relief of Distress Grants (SRD grants), which are used to coach 28 million people to become ready for the universal basic income (UBI) promoted in South Africa to address high levels of poverty and unemployment—see the screenshot below.
After 30 years of corporate social investment (CSI) strategies, South Africa is dead last on the Gini Coefficient, struggling with extreme unemployment and the almost total collapse of small and medium-sized enterprises. CSI is a hoax! Most
companies' strategies don't reflect the understanding of where CSI originates from.
Ill-informed agents of influence planted by white minority capital (WMC) within progressive forces create an environment conducive to implementing the one-world economic order envisaged by the Rupert and Oppenheimer families (Jonathan Oppenheimer refers to the process as creative destruction)- see the screenshots below. Their companies benefit financially from this new world economy.
UBI will be directly linked to the social credit scores (SCS), which will be determined by surveillance software. The surveillance state (cameras) will assess behaviour to determine if the SCS is good enough to qualify for UBI. It would be paid to every South African citizen without any discrimination.
Lawlessness (crime) is the catalyst for the rollout of cameras—see the screenshots below. The surveillance state can only occur if there is lawlessness. Corporations are involved in establishing an environment that contributes to lawlessness.
The ANC is regarded as the biggest crime syndicate in South Africa's history. Yet CEOs partnering with the ANC and other liberation movements meticulously frame coaching agendas in the media with the assistance of state intelligence securitisation apparati (SISA), who deployed assets within progressive forces as agents of influence.
The private sector (third force- screenshot below) is involved with “cadre” deployments to ensure infrastructure implementation for the one-world economic order. WMC is responsible for introducing the surveillance state, a cashless society, open borders, and land nationalisation, all of which are part of the WEF corporate social investment (CSI) strategies. The unholy trinity is responsible for the chaos and undermining of South Africa's constitution.
15 December
What is the role of the progressive forces in parliament?
Parliamentarians' failure to address the private sector, introducing highly contentious issues such as changing the economic model used in South Africa without elections, is directly against the spirit of the Constitution. Professor Sampie Terblanche called them the Mining, Energy Complex (MEC), introducing neo-liberalism. Neo-liberalism is the one-world economic order agenda. Why aren’t progressive forces converging on the collapse of state-run enterprises (SOEs) and acting against the president in parliament? Are they both sides of the same coin?
Rogue ex-apartheid collaborators allow the deployment of influencers (without vetting) within the progressive forces. The progressive agenda introduces the same one-world economic agenda as the Government of National Unity (GNU). SASSA grants, the surveillance state, a cashless society, open borders, and land nationalisation are all part of the WEF one-world economic order corporate social investment (CSI) strategies. In addition, state intelligence securitisation apparati (SISA) collaborators within progressive forces are steering the agenda for white minority capital (WMC).
CSI, climate change, and sustainability are hostile takeovers of constitutional sovereignty by rogue corporations that want to profit from governments. Only governments and companies that comply with sustainability scores (assessed and approved by selective auditing firms) receive these “investments.” Economic hitmen use favourable loans to indebted governments and businesses. The MEC has been changed to mafias, which operate in mining, energy, and communication (the new MEC). Many other CEOs join the feeding frenzy, overwhelmed by greed. See the screenshot below for the root causes of lawlessness. Their transgressions are tantamount to sedition.
Big mining houses deployed agents of influence within their board rooms. Anglo-American, Glencore and other mining houses became the executive arm of the ANC. Mining houses influence the political leadership of liberation movements.
Understanding the dynamics of Eskom price increases will diminish Eskom's income and allow IPPs to be cheaper than Eskom and make a healthy profit. Eskom's exuberant increases only serve the interests of IPPs. It's always the same people.
What happened to Openserve fibre? Telkom was the original owner of high-speed fibre. What was the objective of the unbundling? The private sector introduced high-speed fibre following a specific strategy. In addition, the Competition Commission Tribunal (CCT) already turned down the Maziv (Remgro) and Vodacom “investment”. Rain is another entity that the CCT should investigate. 41% of the shares belong to Paul Harris, a former board member at Remgro. Rantloane (also on the Rain board) took over Harris's position on the Remgro board. Rain is now framed to double the value of Telkom. See the screenshot below. Who privatised Telkom?
The Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) seems captured by a small group of people who dictate and use access to sensitive information to enrich themselves. The current chairman of the JSE, Phuthuma Nhleko (a suspect in an international terrorism case in the US), illustrates the double standards of business.
The implementation of 5G, high-speed fibre, IPPs, and the collapse of the infrastructure industry follow identifiable patterns. Yet, GNUand the progressive forces have NOT mentioned THEIR OPPOSITION to neo-liberalism in parliament.
13 December
Privatisation of SOEs and CSI strategies are mitigating the introduction of the one-world economic order in South Africa.
The companies that supported COVID-19 (did the BUSA CEOs who supported forced vaccinations take the complete series themselves?) are also the protagonists of the one-world economic order (see the company's CSI strategies) agenda. Researching these companies exposed the sinister world of corporate deception and how corporate social investment (CSI) is abused. South Africa is last on the Genie Coefficient, which measures the economic disparity between rich and poor, which was supposed to be addressed by CSI.
Philanthropists justify profiteering because they promote themselves as job creators (SMEs actually create jobs, which became the target of big business during the lockdown). Contrary to what corporations sell, the one-world economy is not creating jobs. There is no justification for protecting philanthropists who undermine the Constitution. This economic agenda is deeply rooted in the influence of the political elite created by the private sector. The objective of the new economic order is to shed jobs, resulting in unemployment, as seen in the South African economy. Businesses blame the ANC (their deployments) for the collapse of SMEs, loss of jobs, and shrinking of the economy. Philanthropists involved in nefarious economic practices must face jail time.
In addition, understanding philanthropic one-world economic theatrics reveals a deeply engrained hostility to outsiders, evident in the operations of the JSE and PIC sponsoring economic exclusivity. The agenda is particularly revealing in the CSI strategic environment, where the one-world economy is created under the auspices of social responsibility. South Africa is central to these nefarious new economic order gymnastics undermining the Constitution.
State institutions must protect citizens against philanthropic reservation practices, now manifesting within local government as “solutions.” Introducing fake multi-billion Rand camera systems to fight crime is an even worse form of state capture than the PPE exploitation during COVID-19 and the Gupta framing agendas to distract from current more severe corruption.
These rogue philanthropists, responsible for job losses, introduced surveillance and the cashless state. The President of the government in South Africa is failing to perform his duties, and he should be charged with dereliction of duty. Who are the deployed agents supporting CR? It is a tell-tale sign!
11 December
Privatisation of SOEs using the United Nations 17 SDGs and CSI strategies?
Who steers the one-world economic order strategies of the surveillance state, social credit score, and universal income grant (coaching society using SASSA grants)? Prioritising the privatisation of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) was part of the agenda of apartheid corporate social responsibility (CSR) agenda copied from the US industry, which started in the 1970s in South Africa. In addition, Klaus Schwab created the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 1971 as a social responsibility platform to protect businesses from mass social descent.
Ex-apartheid corporations changed their CSR to corporate social investment (CSI) and rolled it out after the unbanning of liberation movements in 1990. The apartheid CSI strategy transitioned into a WEF agenda. As an agent of change toward a one-world economic order, CSI was tested/trailed in South Africa. However, it was only through the fake COVID-19 universal shutdown, based on framing agendas by media houses and supported by the private sector (130 CEOs from B4SA), that the one-world economic order agenda started getting momentum. For a short while, rogue philanthropists tried their hand at social media to convince gullible society to accept vaccinations.
The Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG) compliance agenda was introduced as a prerequisite for CSI to force SOEs to accept the one-world economic order agenda. Even small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs - collapsing them) and governments (corrupt politicians) were forced to accept new credit scores and apply these objectives to qualify for social investment.
Crises were created into profitable economic complexes within communication, energy, mining, banking, private security, transport industries, and food and water security. How were Telkom, Eskom, Denel, SAA, SABC and Municipalities privatised? Lawlessness (crime) suddenly became the norm as it was used as a catalyst to introduce the one-world agenda. When you don’t have any income, receiving a mere R350 is sold as the best option, while they (the political and economic elite) live in extravagance.
Klaus Schwab signed a cooperation agreement with the United Nations supporting the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to try and provide legitimacy again to the WEF strategy after the COVID-19 fiasco. The WEF started to focus increasingly on the sustainability agenda. Profiteering, People, and Planet are known as the three Ps. The Three Ps is just a variant of ESG compliance, but it made profiteering fashionable. COVID-19 was meticulously inserted as an agent for change to assist rogue private sector businesses in introducing their one-world economic reforms, benefiting themselves. It was never about social responsibility, which will result in mass social disorder. Businesses and their strategist need to comprehend the enormity of the problem. Philanthropists will frame the ANC as the source of the problem.
08 December
How are sports sponsorships transformed into profiteering CSI agendas?
Corporate Social Investment (CSI) was one of many apartheid business agendas (see the screenshot below to understand the CSI impact) that enticed liberation movements into accepting democracy, culminating in the first free elections in 1994. In South Africa, boardrooms abuse CSI for profiteering instead of addressing social responsibility, as promised during negotiations with liberation movements.
Corporations' failure to ensure that the deployed agents of influence representing liberation movements address socio-economic disparity is evident in the Gini coefficient, unemployment, the shrinking SA economy, and SMEs' collapse. Interpreting these statistics can only conclude that big businesses are oblivious to the needs of the masses. The 130 CEOs involved with supporting the fake nefarious COVID-19 agenda are also supporting the one-world economic agendas (open borders, cashless society, privatisation of SOEs, lawlessness as catalyst for surveillance state and social credit score) and not contributing to the development of the economically marginalised. The South African constitution is under attack by greedy and unscrupulous CEOs of big businesses. The unholy trinity (see the previous posting below for a definition) creates lawlessness.
Elements within the private sector use financial suffocation of sports structures that are not underwriting their one-world economic order agenda. In contrast, rugby (SARU) receives support/investments from the influence of structures that should be scrutinised by the state intelligence securitisation apparati (SISA). This is also prevalent within other sports associations, such as SAFA, where sponsorships have changed to profiteering agendas by philanthropists using their CSI strategies.
Professional sports have become profiteering agendas for corporates. It is only logical that organised crime (sports betting, extortion/use of illegal drugs, and match-fixing) is trying to legitimise its illicit gains by attaching itself to sports stars. The evidence is everywhere, but sports organisations hide it to shield big businesses.
The assassination of the late Bafana Bafana captain, Senzo Meyiwa, indicates the planting of evidence to hide the real culprits. General Sibiya was on the scene for about ten hours before anyone else was allowed. What did he do on the scene for such a long time, and who was the attorney advising him? What happened to the case “obstruction of justice”. How was it possible for the bullet to end up on the kitchen zinc after an entire team of SAPS was on the site (without a word in court)? Could the communication on WhatsApp between the suspects and Kelly be the first time evidence was planted digitally (access to these abilities is well known within the tech-savvy world) to distract from the real culprits? The suspects were known as ANC assassins and are in jail for life. Adding another charge or two will not make a difference. The NPA looks good that they caught the “suspects.”
Exposing the underworld working within the SAPS should have been a much brighter objective! The current court case against Dr Jordaan and two co-accused is riddled with hidden agendas. Sport is under the control of Mafia-like structures, with rogue SISA seemingly out of control protecting career criminals working with them.
06 December
Who is creating an environment conducive to revitalising liberation movements and terrorism?
The role played by journalists in framing agendas on behalf of SISA in the media reveals the true nature of deceit within politics in South Africa. The rogue ex-state intelligence securitisation apparati (SISA) collaborators are deployed to mitigate the fight between progressive forces. The strategy is to artificially create a fight between EFF and MKP, to let GNU look good and be identified as the only solution for South Africa. The DA dictates the GNU agenda in government (they represent Klaus Schwab's and the UN's sustainability strategies), which is the one-world economic order (open borders, cashless, surveillance state, social credit score, privatisation of SOEs, etc.) agenda. Zille confirmed that the DA represents the agenda of businesses (who drive the Klaus Schwab apartheid CSI strategy).
These framing strategies can be followed as a pattern in the media, with journalists publishing agendas on behalf of the unholy trinity. Ex-apartheid collaborators deployed as political/economic elites acting as agents of influence for the private sector complete the “terror” threat posed by the unholy trinity.
The unholy trinity in South Africa is defined as philanthropists advancing the undemocratic agendas of the new world economic order, rogue ex-state intelligence securitisation apparati (SISA) working with career criminals framing agendas to legitimise their illegal activities (using the war on terrorism as an excuse). Political and economic elites exploiting securitisation operations under the auspices of the war on terror are a nefarious agenda by the proponents of the one-world economic order (greedy philanthropists).
The increase in crime activities associated with additional funding for terrorist networks and the reactivation of old apartheid securitisation networks (Jewish Mafia networks are used as proxies within the sport) working with these career criminals is a cause for concern. Israeli, Pakistani, Indian, Chinese, and Russian mobsters operating in South Africa integrating themselves with old apartheid career criminals (SISA know) undermining constitutional rights should not be tolerated. This strategy, using SISA criminal networks to spy on terrorist groups, creates inequality before the law, one of the root causes of lawlessness.
The state needs to arrest these role players in order to bring stability back to South Africa. The state is captured by the unholy trinity, which is committing sedition.