04 April

Inequality is the biggest threat to the Constitution, Part 2

The Great Reset agenda of the World Economic Forum (WEF) centres around stakeholder capitalism, which was created in 1971. Stakeholder capitalism significantly contributes to inequality, economic marginalisation, and the collapse of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and state-owned enterprises (SOEs), all of which highlight failures of the one-world economic reset.

The WEF's “Great Reset” agenda, previously known as the “Global Redesign Initiative,” was developed in response to the 2008 economic crisis. It positions itself as the apex of corporate social responsibility and corporate social investment (CSI). The economic turmoil facing the world can be attributed to the attendees of Davos attempting to implement social responsibility.

Unethical business interference in politics, which supports unprincipled politicians, exacerbates the failures of the WEF. In South Africa, the elites were unable to implement Corporate Social Investment (CSI) strategies to diversify and transform the economy's composition, utilising the World Economic Forum's stakeholder capitalism model. 

Business ethics (BE) is an oxymoron; it is used by CEOs from the World Economic Forum (WEF) to ensure economic exclusivity, resulting in the closure of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and legitimising the pacification of the masses. The private sector seeks to take control of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) for profit-driven purposes, exposing unimaginable traits of greed.

After the unbanning of the liberation movement in South Africa, the private sector (third force) became the custodians of former apartheid spies (mostly career criminals under the banner of BBBEE). Many of these individuals, who are career criminals, provided the ANC with additional funding, which is essential for the ANC's operations. CEOs continue to implement more World Economic Forum (WEF) objectives that exacerbate lawlessness, utilising these agents of influence in the ANC.

The private sector mitigates inequality through the use of the media. The press is the centrifugal force around which the elite communicate their strategic profiteering agendas. Journalists are the drivers of these nefarious agendas, and blaming the ANC is a superficial conceptualisation of the Constitutional treat. The journalists who are used to framing the agendas of businesses reflect the moral decay that has set in within large corporations.

One of the largest cash-based financial enterprises in the world is transnational organised crime (TOC) networks. Yet, these criminal activities, which are used as an additional funding mechanism by liberation movements, such as the ANC, remain a significant factor that the private sector has largely overlooked.

Media framing the government (the ANC) as incompetent and businesses as the saviours of industry is not valid. The threat is not the ANC (yes, they are incredibly incompetent, as illustrated by their inability to confront these issues); it is the unholy trinity that empowers apartheid-era career criminals within the ANC.

Perhaps it is time for voting South Africans to ask who the Top seven are and who represents them at the NEC of the ANC? The Davos Great Reset agenda is flawed; South Africa exemplifies the WEF and EU's unsuccessful efforts in stakeholder capitalism.

Purchase a permadome and start your backyard garden.

www.thepatrioteconomy.org

The unholy trinity in South Africa is defined as:

• rogue philanthropists (also referred to as White Minority Capital) advancing the undemocratic agendas of the one-world economic order,
• rogue ex-state intelligence securitisation apparati (SISA) working with career criminals framing agendas to legitimise their illegal activities (to justify the war on terror) and
• ex-apartheid spies (mostly false-flag) deployed as political/economic elites acting as agents of influence for the private sector inside liberation movements (ANC).

Treason definition: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/treason

Economic sabotage: Economic sabotage 'taking the country back' – SOC chief executives | SAnews

Understanding a criminal enterprise: What is a criminal enterprise? - Military Modelling

AI describes stakeholder capitalism as:

“Stakeholder capitalism is an untested economic system or philosophy in which businesses prioritise the interests of all their stakeholders—not just shareholders (owners or investors)—when making decisions. In addition to shareholders, stakeholders include employees, customers, suppliers, local communities, the environment, and society. The idea is that companies should create long-term value for all these groups rather than focusing solely on maximising short-term profits for shareholders, which is often associated with traditional shareholder capitalism.

Stakeholder capitalism encourages businesses to consider broader social and environmental impacts. For example, a company might invest in sustainable practices, improve employee working conditions, or support community projects, even if these choices don’t immediately boost stock prices. The concept gained traction as a response to criticisms of unchecked capitalism, like inequality, environmental degradation, and corporate scandals.

It’s often linked to figures like Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum, who popularised it through initiatives like the "Davos Manifesto" in 1973 and later updates. Critics argue it’s vague, prone to corporate PR spin (like greenwashing), or even a step toward centralised control if governments or elites push it too hard. Supporters say it’s a necessary evolution to make capitalism more inclusive and sustainable.”

Effects of elitism:

1. Unemployment
2. SME closure
3. Inequality
4. Presidency breaking the law.
5. SME collapse
6. High unemployment
7. Eskom sabotaged and privatised.
8. Denel is in the process of being privatised
9. ISCOR privatised and closed down
10. Prasa is in the process of being privatised
11. SAA is in the process of being privatised
12. Telkom in process to be privatised
13. SABC collapsed
14. Transnet is dead.
15. Petro SA is dead.
16. The Post Office collapsed.
17. The land bank is ineffective.
18. Johannesburg has collapsed.
19. Bloemfontein had collapsed 
20. Durban has collapsed.
21. Intelligence collapsed
22. SANDF imploding.
23. Judiciary imploding.
24. NPA cronyism.
25. The Hawks haven’t prosecuted any Mafia structures
26. SAPS lost detective capacity, and private security is taking over-who is more corrupt?

Introducing the SCS model from China- solution introduced by elites in alignment with the WEF

1. High-speed fibre
2. 5G
3. Going Cashless
4. Social credit score
5. Digital ID
6. Surveillance-Camera rollout
7. Universal basic income (UBI)
8. Open borders

02 April

Inequality is the biggest threat to the Constitution. Part One

The polarisation between the rich and the poor has emerged as a serious threat to the Constitution of South Africa. The Gini Coefficient, which measures wealth inequality, indicates that South Africa ranks last in the world. Furthermore, inequality before the law exacerbates the divide between the elites and the economically marginalised, significantly contributing to lawlessness.

The private sector controls mass media, and its journalists frame lawlessness as a catalyst for the “Great Reset" of the World Economic Forum (WEF). These agendas are well-planned and implemented by the unholy trinity (see the definition below). The Framing Theory, influenced by rogues, often utilises media houses to present a manipulated narrative, deliberately coaching society to accept the agenda of philanthropists. For instance, to accept nefarious agendas such as COVID-19, the media bullied society into fake vaccination policies. Business for South Africa endorsed mandatory vaccinations at the workplace and lockdown, reaffirming the stance of the private sector as a “third force” – see the screenshot below. The Government of National Unity (GNU) is another example of how the press framed the agenda of elites alienating the compromised ANC leadership from the poor.

Rob Hersov illustrates how social media is used to attempt to explain the importance of GNU but overlooks crucial historical variables. He tries to convey the need for urgent economic changes, such as the privatisation of various state-owned enterprises in South Africa, but effectively promotes the WEF's failed one-world economic reset agenda. Hersov’s support for GNU and Gayton McKenzie (associated with the Jewish Mafia) indicates the elite's inability to consider important variables. The mistakes reveal a larger agenda with dire consequences for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It also presents an opportunity for the ANC.

Perhaps the ANC government should take a cue from Putin’s example: summon the owners of conglomerates and give them a choice: conform to the rules or face treason charges. It will not impact the economy, as illustrated by the Russian economy. Additionally, the US, which has the world's most powerful economy, has distanced itself from the WEF's globalist agenda. The US government, under President Trump, is supported by the most prominent conglomerates.

In South Africa, companies have been implementing the Corporate Social Investment (CSI) concept for the past 30 years. There are specific flaws that corporate CEOs have struggled to understand, unless they intend to undermine the ANC government deliberately. CEOs cannot develop solutions while excluding critical variables.

Who police the unconstitutional behaviour of the WEF and the European Union (EU), as they attempt to implement the one-world economic reset agenda?

30 March

Business intelligence strategists develop and implement agendas on behalf of elites. Final

In South Africa, strategists for the apartheid business elite (sanction busting specialists) successfully transformed society during the 1980s, culminating in the unbanning of liberation movements in 1990. This transition necessitated and received extensive interventions from the apartheid state's intelligence securitisation apparatus (SISA) behind the scenes. Like with liberation movements, the elite involved in the transition were made to believe that they were the champions of change. Businesses were not fully informed about the extent of these interventions. Corporate social investment (CSI) is one such example of philanthropists from South Africa overstressing their abilities.

Intelligence, by its nature, utilises collaborators, confidential informants, deep-cover agents, and/or false-flag recruits. The ANC was fully compromised, mostly false flag recruits working with the apartheid SISA structures. The ANC acted merely as an instrument of change. The collapse was orchestrated before the unbanning of liberation movements in 1990 within the corridors of the apartheid securitisation apparatus.

Philanthropists utilise business intelligence strategists to leverage economic exclusivity, establishing monopolies and privatising governments - see the screenshot below, “Anatomy of Fast Money”. The political elites from liberation movements within government are either deployments advancing WEF objectives (DA) or agents of influence (ANC agents of influence) introducing these objectives on behalf of businesses and safeguarding apartheid collaborators.

To protect South Africa from unscrupulous elites, it is essential to monitor former apartheid intelligence assets. These individuals are of interest to foreign intelligence services seeking technology from South Africa. This was evident during the arms deal and many subsequent deals involving foreign tenders. International companies are aiming to secure tenders and utilise these individuals as agents of influence. Even as recently as 2025, some of these ex-apartheid collaborators were still working as agents of influence in awarding tenders to foreign companies from the EU.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) agendas, which exploit compromised leaders of liberation movements, are of particular concern. EU-affiliated countries are highly active in this approach to doing business in Africa.

The unholy trinity typically influences the purpose of deployments. Private sector conspirators within the unholy trinity will face scrutiny from SISA for nefarious activities if they continue to utilise these former apartheid collaborators as agents of influence toward an unconstitutional one-world economic great reset agenda, promoting false sustainability objectives related to climate change, marginalising the masses.

28 March

Business intelligence strategists develop and implement agendas on behalf of elites. Part Four

The elite in South Africa were among the first in the world to align with the WEF's agenda. The South African government attended the Davos gathering annually, even boosting how the new world economy would take shape under the guidance of the WEF elite. Consequently, South Africa can be examined as a case study to reveal how these hidden forces (the deep state) using the unholy trinity (see definition below) undermine the Constitution.

Elites employed business intelligence strategists in South Africa to instigate economic exclusivity, establish monopolies, and privatise governments under corporate social investment (CSI) strategies. These private sector strategists exploit loopholes; without consequences, they exploit them further. Former apartheid elites opted to employ CSI, which is derived from the US approach to corporate social responsibility. Consequently, monitoring global CSI agendas helped track the influence of apartheid businesses and the extent of their networks.

Wherever the WEF implements stakeholder capitalism, the “great reset”, and new technological infrastructure (the digitalisation of state functions) under the umbrella of climate sustainability objectives (which cannot be achieved without active intervention), the state experiences the effects of the unholy trinity (the enforcers) on society's pillars, which manifests as unprecedented corruption, illicit financial flows, and inequality.

The introduction of the elites' one-world economic reset agenda is responsible for the high levels of corruption in the US among Democrats, which nearly entirely undermines the rule of law (the primary reason for the emergence of Trump taking on the unholy trinity), as well as the inefficiency (the rise of compromised leaders) of the woke European Union agenda in addressing lawlessness, including organised crime, corruption, and the erosion of economic regulations. These are all well-known mechanisms that affect the “great reset”, founded on no empirical research; it’s a rudderless ship.

The ANC, oblivious of the forces at play, partnered with China. At the same time, the GNU aligned itself with the EU/WEF, and the Afrikaner groups partnered with the current US leadership (aware of and mitigating the mess) in response to the failures of the elites' sustainability initiatives. The collapse of the mining, energy, transport, intelligence, and water infrastructures has been orchestrated under the banner of the “great reset.” Similar tendencies are emerging elsewhere; it is not the poor or criminals who generate this structured chaos but the elites who drive these agendas to benefit themselves.

The ANC government, blamed for the collapse, has no authority over how CSI development funds are utilised, and after 31 years, the ANC has failed to transform the elitist economy. Inequality has a more sinister consequence: it has created an informal township economy exploited by career criminals with struggle credentials and connections to liberation movements. It is a Robin Hood economy controlled by the ANCs' progressive forces, the foundation of their electorate.

26 March

Business intelligence strategists develop and implement agendas on behalf of elites. Part Two

The Bilderberg Group, representing the interests of Europe and North America (the US), has groomed the WEF to reset profiteering under the banner of sustainability. It doesn’t matter whether the leaders are from the European Union, fighting with Russia, or attempting to prolong the war to stimulate profits (as war is one of the top profiteering genres). If Russia had wanted to march to Paris, Ukraine would have been levelled a long time ago.

Each year, over 1,000 corporations participate in the World Economic Forum's (WEF) gathering at Davos, representing the elites who strive for dominance over societal variables. Their influence over society's three pillars—politics, economics, and religion or family—is crucial for establishing new revenue streams. Without this control, philanthropists risk allowing unwanted competition that could undermine their bottom line. The state's role in protecting society from exploitation by “unscrupulous corporations” has become an oxymoron.

Capitalism is founded on the ability to adapt to changes and increase competition. These cornerstones collapsed with introducing the WEF's “great reset” agenda and stakeholder capitalism. Big business aligned with the WEF's great reset agenda does not like competition.

The US was on the verge of economic collapse because the Democrats were trying to implement one-world economic order agendas. The US has become a cesspool of unethical elitist practices and immorality because they were applying the WEF agenda and hiding behind the war on terror using USAID. The Democrats had become a criminal enterprise. State Intelligence Securitisation apparati (SISA) devised a plan to collapse the “deep state” (unholy trinity).

Kamala Harris was such a lousy candidate for the Democrats that it could only have been deliberate to force Americans to vote for Trump as a Republican (similar methodologies are used in the EU and South Africa). Trump is the maverick candidate needed to implement the turnaround strategy. Trump and Musk (T&M) are taking charge of anti-corruption efforts using DROGE.

One of the key turnaround strategists, Elon Musk, 's most significant shareholders in Tesla are Blackrock, Vanguard, and State Street Corp., known Democrats and funders of elitist agendas manifesting as WEF strategies for the “great reset” and the United Nations 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs).

To safeguard the US economy, Trump had to close USAID. This situation can be attributed to politicians' dependence on philanthropy and corporations' influence in shaping strategies for the WEF's “great reset."